Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 13, 2022. It is now read-only.

Issues with the table of contents in the doc app #16255

Open
3 tasks
Narretz opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 10 comments
Open
3 tasks

Issues with the table of contents in the doc app #16255

Narretz opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Narretz
Copy link
Contributor

Narretz commented Oct 4, 2017

There are a few minor issues with the tocs:

  • Headings in tags that are collected for the module overview pages (e.h. @knownissue) create strange tocs - see https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng "Double Compilation". The heading shouldn't be included at all in the collection of known issues. Solution: a) remove the heading b) introduce a "title" parameter to the @knownIssue tag that is rendered without id / without heading in the module overview page

  • Examples have inconsistent headings:

    • the @example tag is not used consistently - Some pages include "Example" headings. Some pages use only the <example> element which is rendered as a usable example
    • the @example tag creates a simple heading "Examples" . This looks weird when there's only one example, and requires to manually set a heading when there's more than one example. The id is is based on the method name or in all other api contexts, simply "example"
    • Solution for @example :
      • could have "title" param that is extracted and set as an appropriate heading (based on the parent section?) -> since it's jsdoc, it should use the <caption>tag? see http://usejsdoc.org/tags-example.html
      • a single example in a section would be rendered just "Example" (+ caption if available)
      • a collection of Examples would generate a list of "Examples" with the titles / no entry when no "title"
  • Sections / Headings with the same name generate incorrect links in the toc (e.g https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/accessibility). Solution: dgeni / markdown parser should generate unique heading ids OR if it works in the guide, use the @example tag -> doesn't work because @example is a jsdoc tag

@Narretz Narretz self-assigned this Oct 4, 2017
@Narretz Narretz added this to the Backlog milestone Oct 4, 2017
@5earle
Copy link

5earle commented Jan 27, 2018

Good day. i am a student studying open source at Seneca college, and would like to take a go at this project.

@nik72619c
Copy link

Shall I work on this if no one else is ? Willing to work on this issue.

@petebacondarwin
Copy link
Member

@nik72619c if you would like to submit a PR we will happily review it and merge it into the docs.

@nik72619c
Copy link

nik72619c commented Oct 15, 2018

Sure ! working on this one. For the Double compilation heading, should I make changes to the known issue part of the $compile section?

@petebacondarwin
Copy link
Member

Yes I think that is simplest.

@nik72619c
Copy link

So I think taking it out of the known issues section and making it a separate heading might solve the purpose

@Narretz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Narretz commented Oct 16, 2018

The @knownIssue tag really serves a purpose, we can't just take it out. (if that is what you meant to do). We need to solve this issue at the template level, i.e. give @knownIssue a title parameter that is rendered as a heading only in the original document (because that's where you want the toc to actually contain it).

@kambleaa007
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, I am new at open source contribution. @Narretz can you please guide me so i can contribute in documentation , I really like to.

@kambleaa007
Copy link
Contributor

I thinks its very old issue.
With no one seems interested to help this issue.
Someone interested message here.

@petebacondarwin
Copy link
Member

This is not a high priority for the project as it is now in LTS mode, and while not attractive the docs are usable.
Headings in the doc source are always a problem when you want to be able to render the content in different contexts. I am not sure what the best approach is for @knownIssue, since the heading for more complex known issues are very useful, but out of place in the overview table...

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants